03 February 2006
didnt make my point clear enough
ok, you're right. i kind of swept over the fact that dearmin was in support of tuition, and that the students were generally opposed (although i know some students who think tution increases are good--that it makes our school a better place. to that i say: tution = 12% of our school's budget, so clearly there are other more powerful venues to "fundraise" to make our school a better place).
what i had meant to say in my last post (and i kind of did, just got muddled in a lot of other stuff) is that our SBP has no real power. and even though he/she has no real power, we still expect miracles.
and why is it that we're so opposed to tuition hikes? the obvious answer is that we can't afford/don't want to pay more. but what if UNC really needs that money? what if our school will be worse place without it? doesn't that make us look like selfish twentysomethings?
what i had meant to say in my last post (and i kind of did, just got muddled in a lot of other stuff) is that our SBP has no real power. and even though he/she has no real power, we still expect miracles.
and why is it that we're so opposed to tuition hikes? the obvious answer is that we can't afford/don't want to pay more. but what if UNC really needs that money? what if our school will be worse place without it? doesn't that make us look like selfish twentysomethings?